Firstly, some members do not actually have IBD; while some survey respondents stated that they did not have IBD, others may have erroneously identified themselves as IBD patients. Furthermore, support groups such as CCFC might attract a distinct group of patients, or even patients who are more likely to use CAM since they have at least sought out a support group. CCFC members may be looking for something that their physicians cannot provide. The second issue involves the definition of CAM.
Special diets were used by 28% of respondents in this study, but should they be considered CAM? Nearly 8% used a gluten-free diet. Does the use of a gluten-free diet reflect a misinformed patient, a misinformed physician, or a patient actually with celiac disease? Other authors have included exercise and prayer as forms of CAM, but Hilsden et al did not. Is exercise a CAM or is it something that should be advocated by all practitioners as health-promoting behavior?
This study, like others before it , have suggested that 30% to 60% of IBD patients use some form of CAM. At first glance, this may seem to be providing the following message to conventional doctors; “CAM use is rampant among IBD patients. Be open about it. Maybe even consider incorporating some of it.” However, perhaps some of the results of this study soften the alarm bells and support the idea that conventional medical practice might be more acceptable than the proliferation of CAM studies suggests. Find best deals online – viagra professional canadian pharmacy can be available every time you visit.
Category: Inflammatory bowel disease
Tags: CAM, IBD, Inflammatory bowel disease